Allahabad High Court

M/S SPRL INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTDversusCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UTTAR PRADERS STATE INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LTD O/O UPSIDA COMPLEX AND ANOTH

Decided: 7 September 2026
Bench: SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN SARAL SRIVASTAVA

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous.

Summary

M/S Sprl Industries Private Ltd filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the Chief Executive Officer of Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Corporation Ltd and another respondent. The petitioner sought relief, but counsel for the petitioner later submitted that no cause of action remained. The court examined the submission that the petition had become infructuous. Accordingly, the judges held that the petition could not proceed. The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous, with no further orders. No substantive merits of the original claim were addressed.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petition filed by M/S Sprl Industries Private Ltd had become infructuous and thus liable to be dismissed

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
dismissal
cause of action
High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                           WRIT - C No. - 1767 of 2026

                                    M/S Sprl Industries Private Ltd
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    Chief Executive Officer Uttar Praders State Industrial
                                    Corporation Ltd O/O Upsida Complex And Another            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)         : Arpita Tarmali, Sanjay Kumar Gupta
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)         : Jagannath Maurya, Anuj Pratap Singh,
                                                                        C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 40
                                                     HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.

                                    Sri Sanjay Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner states that no
                                    cause of action survives in the present petition and the same may be
                                    dismissed as nfructuous

                                    Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

                                    September 8, 2026
                                    NS
                                                              (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
NITIN KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…