Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SURESH CHANDRAversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Summary

The petitioner, Suresh Chandra, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 17780 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was argued before the Court by counsel Mahipal Singh and Somveer on behalf of the petitioner, while Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. represented the respondents. The petitioner’s counsel subsequently moved that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The Court examined the petition and found that it was indeed not pressed, without needing to consider any substantive merits. Accordingly, the Court allowed the prayer and dismissed the petition as not pressed. The judgment was delivered by Hon’ble Justice Manish Kumar Nigam on 6 May 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is pressed and therefore maintainable

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • not pressed
  • maintainability
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 17780 of 2026

                                    Suresh Chandra
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    The State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Mahipal Singh, Somveer
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 36
                                                      HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

                                    1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that this petition may be
                                    dismissed as not pressed.

                                    2. Prayer so made is allowed.

                                    3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed.



                                                                                    (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)
                                    May 6, 2026
                                    Nitika Sri.




Digitally signed by :-
NITIKA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.