Allahabad High Court
LALMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioner, Lalman, filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 23148 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court, upon receiving this statement, examined whether the petition could still be entertained. Finding that the petition was indeed infructuous, the court dismissed it. The judgment was delivered by Justice Chandra Kumar Rai on September 9, 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a writ petition is declared infructuous by the petitioner’s counsel?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- dismissal
- high court
- procedural law
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 23148 of 2025
Lalman
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Singh, Mohd. Shamim
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has
become infructuous.
2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the
writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Chandra Kumar Rai,J.)
September 9, 2026
Rameez
Digitally signed by :-
RAMEEZ AHMED
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…