Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAKESH KUMAR DUBEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed in default due to non‑appearance of the parties.

Summary

The writ petition (Writ‑C No.25969 of 2010) filed by Rakesh Kumar Dubey and another was listed for a priority hearing. No party appeared before the bench, although the State’s standing counsel was present. The Court dismissed the petition in default and vacated any interim order previously granted. The judges directed that any aggrieved party may file a recall application within one month. The order was signed by Judges Prakash Padia and Vivek Saran on 14 September 2026.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • default dismissal
  • interim order vacated
  • recall application

Judgment

                                            HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                          WRIT - C No. - 25969 of 2010

                                  Rakesh Kumar Dubey And Another
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                  State of U.P. and Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                  Counsel for Petitioner(s)         : Anil Kumar Tiwari
                                  Counsel for Respondent(s)         : B. K. Raghuvanshi, C. S. C., C.S.C.

                                  Court No. - 5
                                                      HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
                                                      HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

                                  1. The matter is listed under heading "Oldest pending cases for priority
                                  hearing".

                                  2. List revised. Nobody is present on behalf of parties though learned
                                  Standing Counsel is present on behalf of the State respondent(s).

                                  3. The writ petition is dismissed in default.

                                  4. Interim order, if any granted earlier, stands vacated.

                                  5. In case, any of the party is aggrieved with this order, he is free to move
                                  the recall application within one month from today.



                                                                        (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.)
                                  September 14, 2026
                                  saqlain




Digitally signed by :-
SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.