Allahabad High Court
BADKUversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- VIVEK SARAN
Holding
The petition is dismissed as the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail other remedies.
Summary
Badku filed a writ petition (Writ No. 27094 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of UP and others. The court, after hearing arguments, recorded written instructions from the Standing Counsel. The petitioner subsequently prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition, seeking liberty to pursue any other legal remedy. Both the State's Standing Counsel and the respondents' counsel did not object to the withdrawal. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition, granting the petitioner the liberty sought.
Issues considered
- Whether a petitioner may withdraw a writ petition after the court has taken cognizance and whether such withdrawal warrants dismissal of the petition.
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- dismissal
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 27094 of 2026
Badku
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arjun Singh Yadav, Babu Lal Ram
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C.
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.
1. Pursuant to the last order of this Court, learned Standing Counsel has
produced written instructions before the Court, the same are taken on
record.
2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for
withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to avail the remedy as
available under law.
3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for
the respondent does not have any objection to the above prayer.
4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed
for.
September 23, 2026
Deepika
(Vivek Saran,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
DEEPIKA SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…