Allahabad High Court
AJAY KUMAR UPADHYAY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary
The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Upadhyay and two others, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 28051 of 2026) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. The petition was heard before Hon'ble Justice Chandra Kumar Rai. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, submitted that the petition should be dismissed as not pressed. The court accepted this submission. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition that is not pressed?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- not pressed
- maintainability
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 28051 of 2026
Ajay Kumar Upadhyay And 2 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
1. After argument at length, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel
for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition be dismissed as not
pressed.
2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the
writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Chandra Kumar Rai,J.)
September 9, 2026
Rameez
Digitally signed by :-
RAMEEZ AHMED
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…