Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JAMUNA PRASADversusADDL.COMMISSIONER DEVI PATAN GONDA AND OTHERS

Decided
Disposal
Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No hearing was conducted and the petitioners failed to prosecute the case. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The Court also vacated any interim order that may have been in force. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • interim order vacated

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             LUCKNOW
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 3000095 of 1999

                                     Jamuna Prasad
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                     Addl.Commissioner Devi Patan Gonda And Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                     Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : A.R.Khan, Dr. Pooja Singh, Lakshman
                                                                       Singh, Mahendra Bahadur Singh,
                                                                       Shashwat Srivastava, Surya Prakash
                                                                       Tiwari
                                     Counsel for Respondent(s)       : Chief Standing Counsel, Kailash
                                                                       Chandra, Vivek Kumar Mishra

                                    Court No. - 4
                                                            HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.

                                    1. List has been revised. None for the petitioner. Learned Additional
                                    Chief Standing Counsel is present.

                                    2. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    3. Interim order, if any, is vacated.


                                                                                                (Irshad Ali,J.)
                                    October 31, 2025
                                    Gautam




Digitally signed by :-
GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.