Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ANKIT RAJversusINDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition.

Summary

Ankit Raj filed a writ petition against Indian Oil Corporation Limited and two others, seeking relief. The petitioner later obtained a No Objection Certificate and completed the dealership, rendering the petition moot. He requested the court to dismiss the petition and allow him to file a fresh petition reflecting the new developments. The court held that the petition was not pressed and dismissed it, granting liberty to file a fresh petition. No substantive merits were adjudicated as the matter was deemed settled by the subsequent actions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is pressed and maintainable in view of the issuance of a No Objection Certificate and completion of the dealership

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • not pressed
  • No Objection Certificate
  • dealership
  • fresh petition

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 31004 of 2026

                                    Ankit Raj
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    Indian Oil Corporation Limited And 2 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Anshul Kumar        Singhal,   Shashwat
                                                                       Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : Anand Tiwari

                                    Court No. - 40
                                                     HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anand Tiwari, learned
                                    counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 & 2 and Sri Santosh Kumar
                                    Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3.

                                    2. It is informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that No Objection
                                    Certificate has been issued and the dealership has also been completed.
                                    He, therefore, prays that the present writ petition may be dismissed with
                                    liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition bringing on record the
                                    subsequent developments.

                                    3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to
                                    the petitioner to file a fresh petition.



                                                                (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)
                                    September 9, 2026
                                    Arif




Digitally signed by :-
MOHAMMAD ARIF
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.