Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAJVEER YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum.

Summary

Rajveer Yadav filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 31469 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. After hearing arguments, the petitioner's counsel prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, seeking liberty to approach a more appropriate forum. The Court considered the maintainability of the petition and the adequacy of the relief sought. The judges allowed the prayer, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate forum. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as not pressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable and pressed for relief

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • maintainability
  • appropriate forum
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 31469 of 2025

                                    Rajveer Yadav
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Arun Kumar Sharma, Avinash Chandra
                                                                      Yadav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 5
                                                        HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
                                                        HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

                                    1. After some arguments, a prayer has been made by the counsel for the
                                    petitioner to dismiss the present petition as not pressed with liberty to the
                                    petitioner to approach before appropriate forum.

                                    2. Prayer is allowed.

                                    3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty
                                    as prayed.



                                                                         (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.)
                                    September 17, 2026
                                    Swati




Digitally signed by :-
SWATI PATHAK
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.