Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ADITYA BIRLA FASHION AND RETAIL LIMITEDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is disposed with liberty to file a reply; interim protection is granted pending such reply, and no coercive action shall be taken for five weeks.

Summary

The petitioners, Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking to quash a communication (No. 938/Stamp Clerk/2023) issued by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Kanpur Nagar. The petition raised procedural and substantive objections to the said communication. The High Court, after noting the counsel’s submissions, disposed of the petition without deciding the merits, granting the petitioners liberty to file a reply within one week of the order. The Court directed that, upon receipt of a reply, the respondents must consider the contentions, afford a hearing, and pass a reasoned order within four weeks. No coercive action may be taken against the petitioners for five weeks from the date of the order, and the protection granted will lapse automatically if no reply is filed within the stipulated time.

Issues considered

  • Whether the communication No. 938/Stamp Clerk/2023 issued by the Additional District Magistrate can be quashed.
  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to interim protection pending a hearing on the merits.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • quash order
  • interim protection
  • procedural order
  • High Court of Allahabad
  • reply deadline
  • coercive action

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                           WRIT - C No. - 32262 of 2026

                                    Aditya Birla Fashion And Retail Limited
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus
                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Dhruv Pratap Singh, Divya Prakash
                                                                       Tripathi, Tanmay Sadh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 38
                                                        HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J.

                                    1. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking quashing of the
                                    impugned communication bearing No. 938/Stamp Clerk/2023, issued from
                                    the office of the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue),
                                    Kanpur Nagar.

                                    2. The instructions filed by Shri Siddharth Singh, learned Standing Counsel,
                                    are taken on record.

                                    3. The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a reply
                                    to the notice. In the event such reply is filed, the respondent shall consider
                                    and record findings on the contentions raised therein and pass a reasoned and
                                    speaking order after affording an appropriate opportunity of hearing to the
                                    petitioner. If the reply is filed within one week from the date of receipt of a
                                    copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided within the next
                                    four weeks. Till the expiry of five weeks from today, no coercive action
                                    shall be taken against the petitioner.

                                    4. In the event the reply is not filed within one week from the date of receipt
                                    of a copy of this order, the protection granted by this order shall
                                    automatically stand vacated.

                                    September 21, 2026
                                    Shafique
                                                                                              (Vinod Diwakar,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SAFIKUR RAHAMAN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.