Allahabad High Court
VIRENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed as it was not pressed by the petitioner.
Summary
Virendra Singh filed Writ Petition No. 33196 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and four other respondents. During the hearing, counsel Ms. Pritika Tiwari, appearing on behalf of advocate Shailendra, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ petition and preferred to seek the appropriate remedy available under law. The Court noted that the petitioner had effectively withdrawn his request to press the writ. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. The dismissal was recorded without any further directions or orders.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed when the petitioner indicates a desire not to press the petition and to pursue alternative remedies
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal of petition
- dismissal
- appropriate remedy
- high court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 33196 of 2026
Virendra Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nitesh Kumar, Shailendra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
1. Ms. Pritika Tiwari (Advocate Roll A/P 1861/2025) holding brief of Sri
Shailendra, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does
not want to press the writ petition as he wants to avail appropriate remedy
available in law.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the
aforesaid liberty.
September 9, 2026
SS
(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…