Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MAHENDRA SINGH DHANGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

A writ petition may be dismissed when the petitioner expressly indicates that he does not wish to press the petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Mahendra Singh Dhangar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through counsel Rajesh Kumar Pandey, expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the writ and preferred to seek any other appropriate legal remedy. The petitioner therefore requested that the petition be withdrawn. The Court considered the petitioner's request and, finding that the petitioner was not pressing the writ, exercised its discretion to dismiss the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed without any merits being adjudicated.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • court discretion
  • high court procedure

Judgment

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 33275 of 2026

                                    Mahendra Singh Dhangar
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                  :   Rajesh Kumar Pandey
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                  :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 40
                                                     HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.

                                    1. Sri Rajesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner states that
                                    the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition as he wants to avail
                                    appropriate remedy available in law.

                                    2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the
                                    aforesaid liberty.

                                    September 9, 2026
                                    SS

                                                              (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.