Allahabad High Court
MANISH PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the State, but counsel informed the court that an FIR had already been lodged under Section 137(2) of the B.N.S. Police Station Lehariyasarai, District Darbhanga, Bihar. The court held that the existence of the pending FIR rendered the petition infructuous. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground that it had become infructuous. No further arguments or evidence were considered. The dismissal was recorded on September 30, 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is infructuous due to the filing of a pending FIR in the matter
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- FIR
- dismissal
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 34301 of 2026
Manish Pandey And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhananjai Rai, Divyanshu Nishad,
Udit Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 75
HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in
the instant case F.I.R. has already been lodged in Case Crime No.
5106043260425 of 2025 under Section 137 (2) of B.N.S. Police
Station Lehariyasarai, District Darbhanga, Bihar, and therefore, the
instant petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of above, the instant petition has become infructuous and is
dismissed as having become infructuous.
September 30, 2026
Priyanka
(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
PRIYANKA KUSHWAHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…