Allahabad High Court
CHAKRADHAR DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as not pressed because the petitioner voluntarily withdrew it.
Summary
Petitioner Chakradhar Dubey filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel Deepak Kashinath Dubey, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek an alternative remedy. The respondents, the State of U.P. and two others, were represented by Ayush Mittal, C.S.C., and Vineet Sankalp. The Court considered whether it could dismiss the petition on the ground that it was not pressed. Relying on the petitioner’s clear request to withdraw, the Court held that the petition could be dismissed without further hearing. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioner to pursue any other appropriate remedy.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition can be dismissed as not pressed when the petitioner seeks to withdraw it?
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- dismissal
- procedural law
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 34443 of 2026
Chakradhar Dubey
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Kashinath Dubey
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ayush Mittal, C.S.C., Vineet Sankalp
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
Sri Deepak Kashinath Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
he does not want to press the present petition and prays that same may be
dismissed as not pressed as the petitioner wants to avail other remedy
available in law.
Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to
the petitioner to avail other appropriate remedy available in law.
September 9, 2026
Gaurav
(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)
Digitally signed by :-
GAURAV PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…