Allahabad High Court
HARENDRA BALIYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The Court held that the District Magistrate must consider the petitioner's representation dated 17 August 2026.
Summary
Harendra Baliyan filed a writ petition seeking security and submitted a representation dated 17 August 2026 to the District Magistrate. The petitioner, through counsel, requested that the court direct the District Magistrate to consider this representation. The State, represented by the Additional Chief Standing Counsel, indicated that the representation would be dealt with. The Court held that it was not necessary to notice private respondents and ordered the District Magistrate to consider the petitioner's representation and to inform the petitioner of the decision within three weeks. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court should direct the District Magistrate to consider the petitioner's representation for security
Subjects
- security
- writ petition
- representation
- district magistrate
- high court order
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 35013 of 2026
Harendra Baliyan
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 9 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Singh, Vinod Kumar
Pandey
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 21
HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J.
HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
1. Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, learned advocate appears on behalf of
petitioner and submits, his client by representation dated 17th August,
2026 applied for security. There be direction upon respondent no. 2 (the
District Magistrate) to consider it.
2. Mr. Amit Manohar, learned advocate, Additional Chief Standing
Counsel appears for State. He submits, the representation will be duly
dealt with.
3. We do not deem it necessary to notice private respondents. This is
because we direct respondent no. 2 to consider petitioner's representation
dated 17th August, 2026. Said respondent may notice private respondents,
if necessary. Petitioner will communicate certified copy of this order
along with copy of his application to said respondent. Decision taken be
informed to petitioner within three weeks thereof.
4. The writ petition is disposed of.
(Arindam Sinha,J.)
(Satya Veer Singh,J.)
September 11, 2026
Jaswant
Digitally signed by :-
JASWANT KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…