Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

ALL GOVERNMENTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that a petition may be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.

Summary

A writ petition (Writ C No. 35360 of 2026) was filed by All Government against the State of U.P. and three others. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioner, Ashok Kumar Lal, informed the court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The court considered the petitioner's request to withdraw the suit. No substantive issues on the merits were addressed, and the court found no reason to reject the withdrawal. Accordingly, the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn in the presence of counsel for the respondents.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition and have it dismissed as withdrawn?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 35360 of 2026

                                    All Government
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Ashok Kumar Lal, Uday Pratap Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : C.S.C., Shyam Mani Shukla

                                    Court No. - 40
                                                     HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.

                                    1. Sri Ashok Kumar Lal, learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at
                                    some length submits that petitioner does not want to press the present
                                    petition and prays that same may be dismissed as withdrawn.

                                    2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

                                    3. This order has been passed in the presence of Sri Anubhav Singh, learned
                                    counsel for respondent nos.2, 3 and 4.



                                                              (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    Gaurav




Digitally signed by :-
GAURAV PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.