Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SUBASH CHANDRA @ SUBHASH MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn due to lack of locus standi.

Summary

Petitioner Subash Chandra filed a writ petition challenging an order from a departmental inquiry. The petitioner's counsel conceded that, as a complainant, the petitioner lacked locus standi to contest the order. The respondent's counsel raised no objection to the petitioner's request to withdraw. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the departmental inquiry were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner has locus standi to challenge the departmental inquiry order
  • Whether the writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • locus standi
  • withdrawal
  • departmental inquiry
  • Allahabad High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                           WRIT - C No. - 35366 of 2026

                                    Subash Chandra @ Subhash Mishra
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 6 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Abhishek Goswami, Shiv Pujan Bharti
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 36
                                               HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Sri S.P. Bharti, learned counsel for petitioner, after being confronted

                                    that being a complainant, petitioner has no lis to challenge the order

                                    passed in departmental inquiry against contesting respondents, fairly

                                    submits that this writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.


                                    2. Sri H.C. Dube, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing

                                    for State-Respondents, has no objection to aforesaid prayer.


                                    3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                                               (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    AK




Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.