Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SAGUFTA ISHRARversusPURVANCHAL VIDHUT VITRANA NIGAM LTD AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Summary

Sagufta Ishrar filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 35438 of 2026) against Purvanchal Vidhut Vitrana Nigam Ltd and another respondent. The respondent, represented by N.K. Tiwari, placed on record instructions dated 24‑08‑2026. After hearing arguments, the petitioner’s counsel prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court accepted this prayer. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed as not pressed, with liberty granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is pressed and maintainable

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • not pressed
  • fresh filing
  • electricity department

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                              WRIT - C No. - 35438 of 2026

                                    Sagufta Ishrar
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    Purvanchal Vidhut Vitrana Nigam Ltd And
                                    Another                                                    .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Arun Mishra, Puneet Kumar Singh,
                                                                       Vijay Pratap Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : Narendra Kumar Tiwari

                                    Court No. - 5
                                                            HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
                                                            HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

                                    1. Sri Rakesh Kumar Mishra, holding brief of Sri N.K. Tiwari, learned
                                    counsel for the Respondent/Electricity Department has placed before the
                                    Court the instructions dated 24.08.2026, the same is taken on record.

                                    2. After some arguments, a prayer has been made by the counsel for the
                                    petitioner to dismiss the present writ petition as not pressed with liberty to
                                    file fresh.

                                    3. Prayer is allowed.

                                    4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as
                                    prayed.



                                                                           (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Gaurav Kuls




Digitally signed by :-
GAURAV KULSHRESTHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.