Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

MOHD. NADEEMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as not pressed because the demand notice was withdrawn.

Summary

Mohd. Nadeem filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice issued by the State of U.P. and other respondents. The respondents subsequently withdrew the demand notice and submitted a letter dated 7 September 2026 to the Additional District Magistrate, Finance & Revenue, Bareilly, confirming the withdrawal. The petitioners, through senior counsel, moved that the petition be dismissed as it was no longer pressed. The Court examined the withdrawal letter and found that the relief sought was no longer required. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as not pressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition remains maintainable after the underlying demand notice has been withdrawn

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal of notice
  • dismissal
  • not pressed
  • maintainability

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                               WRIT - C No. - 35515 of 2026

                                    Mohd. Nadeem
                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                               .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)           : Mohit Singh, Stuti Rai, Sr. Advocate
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)           : C.S.C., Mukesh Kumar Singh

                                    Court No. - 5
                                                         HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
                                                         HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

                                    1. It is informed by Sri Mukesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the
                                    respondent nos.4 and 5 that demand notice issued against the petitioner has
                                    already been withdrawn and a letter in this regard has already been written
                                    by the respondent no.5 to the Addl. District Magistrate (Finance &
                                    Revenue), Bareilly dated 7.9.2026, copy of the same has been placed before
                                    this Court, the same is taken on record.

                                    2, After going through the same, a prayer has been made by Sri B.C. Rai,
                                    learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Mohit Singh to dismiss the present
                                    petition as not pressed.

                                    3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.



                                                                            (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.)
                                    September 8, 2026
                                    Gaurav Kuls




Digitally signed by :-
GAURAV KULSHRESTHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.