Allahabad High Court
SMT. TANU SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Holding
The petition is non‑maintainable and is dismissed.
Summary
The petitioners, Smt. Tanu Sharma and another, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 35666 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, opposed the petition on the ground that the same matter had already been registered as Mu. A. 0. San 455/2026 under Section 87 of the B.N.S. at Gadhmukte Shwar, Janpad Hapud. The learned permanent advocate argued that the petition was therefore non‑maintainable and liable to be dismissed. The Court, after considering the submissions and the pleadings, held that the petition was indeed barred by the earlier registration and ordered its dismissal. The judgment was delivered by Justice Gautam Chowdhary on 9 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable in view of a pending case (Mu. A. 0. San 455/2026) concerning the same subject matter under Section 87 of the B.N.S.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S. — s. 87
Subjects
- maintainability
- writ petition
- dismissal
- Section 87
- pending case
- res judicata
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 35666 of 2026
Smt. Tanu Sharma And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kapil Tyagi
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 75
HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
याचीगण के विद्वान अधिवक्ता व विद्वान स्थायी अधिवक्ता को सुना एवं पत्रावली का परिशीलन
किया।
विद्वान स्थायी अधिवक्ता का कथन है इस प्रश्नगत प्रकरण मु०अ०सं० 455/2026, धारा 87
बी.एन.एस., थाना गढ़मुक्ते श्वर, जनपद हापुड़ में पंजीकृत हो चुकी है। इसलिए, यह याचिका
पोषणीय नहीं है तथा निरस्त किये जाने योग्य है।
तद्नुसार, उपरोक्त तर्कों के परिप्रेक्ष्य में इस याचिका को निरस्त किया जाता है।
(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
September 9, 2026
CP.sahani
Digitally signed by :-
CHANDRA PRAKASH SAHANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…