Allahabad High Court
SONUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
Sonu filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and four other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Rati Bhan Singh, informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court considered the counsel’s statement that there was no longer any cause of action to be pursued. No substantive merits of the petition were examined. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. The order was pronounced by Justice Chandra Kumar Rai on 9 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable in view of its alleged infructuousness
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- infructuous
- high court
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 35694 of 2026
Sonu
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rati Bhan Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Mr. Rati Bhan Singh, leaned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the
writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Chandra Kumar Rai,J.)
September 9, 2026
Rameez
Digitally signed by :-
RAMEEZ AHMED
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…