Allahabad High Court
NARENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The court ordered that any inquiry initiated under the MGNREGA Act must be concluded expeditiously, and if already concluded, its findings may be taken note of.
Summary
The petitioner, a complainant under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005, filed a writ petition seeking expeditious completion of an inquiry that had been ordered but remained pending. The petition cited a letter dated 31‑12‑2025 from the Chief Development Officer, Aligarh, indicating that an Inquiry Officer had been appointed but the inquiry was not concluded. The petitioner argued that the delay violated the statutory mandate for timely investigation under the MGNREGA Act. The court, without issuing notice to the respondents, disposed of the petition, directing that any pending inquiry be concluded promptly and that any already concluded inquiry be taken note of. No substantive hearing on the merits was conducted, and the order was limited to procedural direction to expedite the inquiry.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court can direct the expeditious conclusion of an MGNREGA Act inquiry without issuing notice to the respondents.
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable in the absence of notice to the contesting respondents.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- MGNREGA
- writ petition
- administrative inquiry
- expeditious investigation
- public welfare
- procedural direction
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 35715 of 2026
Narendra Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 7 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Mohan Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Krishna Kant Singh
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Sri Satish Mohan Tiwari, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri
Prabhakar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents and
Sri K.K. Singh, Advocate for Respondent-8.
2. Petitioner, a complainant, has filed a complaint under the provisions of
MGNREGA Act, 2005, which has been taken cognizance and a reference
is made to a letter dated 31.12.2025 of Chief Development Officer,
Aligarh, however, till date inquiry is not concluded despite an Inquiry
Officer was appointed, therefore, this writ petition is filed to expedite the
inquiry.
3. In aforesaid circumstances, without issuing notice to contesting-
respondent, this writ petition is disposed of that in case inquiry is already
initiated, the same be concluded expeditiously. If any inquiry on same
issue is already concluded, the same may also be taken note of.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
September 9, 2026
AK
Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…