Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

GAJALA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as it is not maintainable because the same matter is already pending in another case.

Summary

Gajala and another filed writ petition No. 35765 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The respondents filed a counter‑affidavit and the permanent advocate argued that the same matter is already pending as MU A S No. 728/2026 under Sections 87 and 351(2) of the B.N.S. at Quarsi police station, Aligarh. The court examined the pleadings and accepted the contention that the petition is not maintainable because the issue is already before another forum. Consequently, the court held that the writ petition must be struck down. The petition was dismissed on the ground of non‑maintainability.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the same cause of action is already pending in another case (MU A S 728/2026).
  • Whether the doctrine of res judicata applies to bar the filing of the present petition.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • maintainability
  • res judicata
  • dismissal
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                   WRIT - C No. - 35765 of 2026

                                    Gajala And Another
                                                                                                                 .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                                 Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                    :   Lalita Sahu, Sonu Kumar Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                    :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 75
                                                     HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

                                    प्रत्युत्तर सं० 4 की ओर से विद्वान अधिवक्ता श्री सैफ अली द्वारा वकालतनामा दाखिल किया गया,
                                    इसे पत्रावली पर रखा जाय।

                                    याचीगण के विद्वान अधिवक्ता, प्रत्युत्तर सं० 4 के विद्वान अधिवक्ता व विद्वान स्थायी अधिवक्ता को
                                    सुना एवं पत्रावली का परिशीलन किया।

                                    विद्वान स्थायी अधिवक्ता का कथन है इस प्रश्नगत प्रकरण मु०अ०सं० 728/2026, धारा
                                    87/351(2) बी.एन.एस., थाना क्वार्सी, जनपद अलीगढ़ में पंजीकृत हो चुकी है। इसलिए, यह
                                    याचिका पोषणीय नहीं है तथा निरस्त किये जाने योग्य है।

                                    तद्नुसार, उपरोक्त तर्कों के परिप्रेक्ष्य में इस याचिका को निरस्त किया जाता है।



                                                                                               (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
                                    September 9, 2026
                                    CP.sahani




Digitally signed by :-
CHANDRA PRAKASH SAHANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.