Allahabad High Court
ISHTIYAK AHMADversusUTTAR PRADESH RAJYA DWARA PRADHAN SACHIV URJA AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
Summary
Petitioner Ishtiyak Ahmad filed a writ petition challenging a final assessment order dated 18 March 2026 issued by the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Department. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition and was granted liberty to file an appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The respondent did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court examined the petition and the withdrawal request, found no objection, and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn while allowing the petitioner to pursue an appeal in the appropriate forum. The decision was pronounced by Judges Prakash Padia and Indrajeet Shukla on 9 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition can be withdrawn with liberty to appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003
Legislation cited
- Electricity Act, 2003 — s. 127
Subjects
- Electricity Act
- Section 127
- withdrawal of petition
- assessment order
- writ petition
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 35778 of 2026
Ishtiyak Ahmad
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Uttar Pradesh Rajya Dwara Pradhan Sachiv Urja
And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Chetan Chatterjee
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.
1. Sri Chetan Chaterjee, learned counsel for the respondent
No.3/Electricity Department placed before this Court final assessment
order dated 18.03.2026, copy of the same is taken on record and a copy of
the aforesaid order has also been provided to the petitioner.
2. After going through the same, a prayer has been made by learned
counsel for the petitioner to dismiss the present petition as withdrawn
with liberty to file appeal as provided under Section 127 of the Electricity
Act 2003 before appropriate forum.
3. This prayer has not been opposed by Sri Chetan Chaterjee, learned
counsel for the respondent No.3.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as
prayed.
(Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.)
September 9, 2026
saqlain
Digitally signed by :-
SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…