Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DEEPAK JAIN NIRALA @ POET DEEPAK NIRALAversusSTATE OF U.P AND 5 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of, granting the petitioner liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars and an affidavit.

Summary

The petitioner, Deepak Jain Nirala, filed a writ petition (Writ C No. 36373 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and five other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Chitranshu Srivastav, sought liberty for the petitioner to file a fresh petition with better particulars and an affidavit. The respondents, represented by C.S.C. and Manjari Singh, raised no objection to this request. The learned judge, Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, considered the procedural request and, finding no opposition, disposed of the present writ petition. The court granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh petition with the required details, effectively dismissing the current petition without prejudice.

Issues considered

  • What procedural relief can be granted when a petitioner seeks liberty to re‑file a writ petition with better particulars?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • procedural relief
  • re‑filing
  • liberty to file fresh petition
  • disposal without prejudice

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - C No. - 36373 of 2026

                                    Deepak Jain Nirala @ Poet Deepak Nirala
                                                                                                      .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Versus

                                    State Of U.P And 5 Others
                                                                                                    .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                     :   Chitranshu Srivastav
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                     :   C.S.C., Manjari Singh

                                    Court No. - 36
                                                HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Sri Siddharth Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Chitranshu

                                    Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner, at the outset, submits that this writ

                                    petition may be disposed of with liberty to petitioner to file a fresh with

                                    better particulars alongwith affidavit of petitioner himself.


                                    2. Mrs. Manjari Singh, learned counsel for respondents has no objection.


                                    3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty, as prayed for.


                                                                                  (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    September 18, 2026
                                    AK




Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.