Allahabad High Court
MANOHAR SINGHversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
If an objection has been filed against a notice under the Child Labour Act and there is no legal impediment, the matter must be decided expeditiously.
Issues considered
- Whether an objection filed against a notice under the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 mandates an expeditious decision by the court
Legislation cited
Subjects
- child labour
- notice
- objection
- expeditious disposal
- writ petition
- High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 36419 of 2026
Manohar Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Up And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Kumar Srivastava, Deepanshi
Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Ms. Deepanshi Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri
Prabhakar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner, on instruction, submits that she is pressing
only prayer no. (B) that since an objection has already been filed to the
notice issued under the provisions of Child Labour (Prohibition and
Regulation) Act, 1986, the same may be decided expeditiously.
3. In aforesaid circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of that if an
objection has already been filed against notice issued under the provisions of
aforesaid Act and if there is no legal impediment, the same be decided
expeditiously in accordance with law.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
September 18, 2026
AK
Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…