Allahabad High Court
RAMA FLOOR MILL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed as not pressed due to the settlement between the parties.
Summary
The petitioners, Rama Floor Mill and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioners informed the Court that a final settlement had been reached between the parties. They consequently prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. The Court, after noting the settlement, dismissed the petition on the ground that it was no longer pressed. The order was recorded in the presence of the respondent's counsel. No substantive merits of the petition were examined as the matter was settled out of court.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition when the parties have reached a settlement and the petitioner seeks dismissal as not pressed?
Subjects
- settlement
- writ petition
- dismissal
- not pressed
- civil procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 37565 of 2026
Rama Floor Mill And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Mohan Pandey, Om Prakash
Katiyar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amrish Sahai, C.S.C., Sachin Mishra
Court No. - 5
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.
1. Today when the matter is taken up, it is informed by learned counsel
for the petitioners that final settlement is going to be made between the
parties and prays that the petition be dismissed as not pressed.
2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed.
3. This order is passed in the presence of Sri Amrish Sahai, leanred
counsel for the respondent-Bank.
(Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.)
September 30, 2026
saqlain
Digitally signed by :-
SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…