Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT RINKI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The stay application must be decided expeditiously in accordance with Rule 259 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Rules, 1947.

Summary

Petitioner Smt. Rinki Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 37661 of 2026) challenging an order of the District Magistrate, Kushi Nagar, and also moved a stay application dated 23 July 2026. The petitioner sought a prompt decision on the stay application and the appeal (No. 1619/2026) within the period prescribed by law. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, noted the necessity of expeditious disposal of the stay application in accordance with Rule 259 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Rules, 1947. No substantive merits of the underlying dispute were addressed in the order. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of, with a direction that the stay application be decided swiftly as per the applicable rule.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate time frame for deciding the stay application filed by the petitioner under the procedural rules governing the case?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • stay application
  • expeditious disposal
  • U.P. Panchayat Raj Rules
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 37661 of 2026

                                    Smt Rinki Devi
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                       :      Munna Tiwari
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                       :      C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 36
                                               HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.



                                    1. Heard Sri Munna Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri
                                    R.K.Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel.

                                    2. Petitioner has approached this Court to decide the stay application
                                    dated 23.7.2026 as well as Appeal No.1619/2026 bearing computer
                                    no.C202605000001619 (Smt. Rinki Devi Vs. District Magistrate Kushi
                                    Nagar & Ors) within a stipulated period.

                                    3. Writ Petition is disposed of with an observation that above referred stay
                                    application be decided expeditiously in accordance with law taking note
                                    of Rule 259 of U.P. Panchayat Raj Rules, 1947.



                                                                               (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    September 18, 2026
                                    SB




Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.