Allahabad High Court
RIFAKAT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is disposed of, granting the petitioners liberty to file independent applications under Rule 9 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj (Registration of Electors) Rules, 1994 for inclusion in the voter list.
Summary
The petitioners, Rifakat and two others, filed a writ petition seeking relief for inclusion of their names in the electoral roll. The petitioners' counsel requested that the petition be disposed of while granting them liberty to file independent applications under Rule 9 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj (Registration of Electors) Rules, 1994 for inclusion in the voter list. The respondent's counsel raised no objection to this request. The Court, after noting the submissions, disposed of the writ petition, granting the petitioners liberty to file the required applications and directing that such applications be decided expeditiously, provided no other legal impediment exists. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without further orders.
Issues considered
- What relief, if any, should be granted to the petitioners for inclusion of their names in the electoral roll?
Legislation cited
- U.P. Panchayat Raj (Registration of Electors) Rules, 1994
Subjects
- voter list
- electoral roll
- Rule 9
- U.P. Panchayat Raj (Registration of Electors) Rules
- writ petition
- inclusion
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 37717 of 2026
Rifakat And 2 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prakhar Saran Srivastava
Court No. - 36
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Sri M.K.Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri Akhilesh Kumar Singh,
learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing for sometime fairly
submitted that he has received instructions that this writ petition be
disposed of with liberty to petitioners to file independent applications
under Rule 9 of U.P. Panchayat Raj (Registration of Electors) Rules, 1994
for inclusion of their respective names in the concern voter list.
2. Sri Prakhar Saran Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no.2
has no objection against the aforesaid submission.
3. In the aforesaid circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with
aforesaid liberty and with further observation that if respective
applications are filed by the petitioners under the aforesaid provisions,
same be decided expeditiously, if there is no other legal impediment.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
September 18, 2026
SB
Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…