Allahabad High Court
DIKSHA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Holding
The petition is dismissed as ineffective because a FIR has already been filed.
Summary
The petitioners Diksha and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and others. The court noted that a First Information Report had already been registered under M.P. No. 546 of 2026, Section 87 of the B.N.S., at Kotwali Urai, Jaunpur on 14 September 2026 against the same accused. Because the FIR was already in place, the petition was deemed ineffective. The petitioners’ counsel could not rebut this observation. Accordingly, the court dismissed the petition as ineffective.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable when a FIR has already been filed against the same accused under the relevant statutory provision.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S. — s. 87
Subjects
- Writ petition
- FIR
- Section 87
- Petition dismissed
- Effectiveness of petition
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 38298 of 2026
Diksha And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ved Prakash Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 75
HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
1. विद्वान स्थायी अधिवक्ता ने यह सूचित किया कि इस मामले में मु०अ०सं० 546 वर्ष
2026, अंतर्गत धारा 87 बी.एन.एस., थाना कोतवाली उरई, जनपद जालौन, में दिनांक
14.09.2026 को याची संख्या 2 के विरुद्ध प्रथम सूचना रिपोर्ट दर्ज किया जा चुका है, अतः
यह याचिका निष्प्रभावी हो चुकी है।
2. याचीगण के विद्वान अधिवक्ता, विद्वान स्थायी अधिवक्ता द्वारा दिए गए उपरोक्त कथनों का
खंडन नहीं कर सके।
3. उपरोक्तानुसार यह याचिका निष्प्रभावी होने के कारण निरस्त की जाती है।
(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
September 23, 2026
Pawan Kumar
Digitally signed by :-
PAWAN KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…