Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT SUNNY YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Smt. Sunny Yadav and another, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. They informed the court that they are residents of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand and are currently residing together in Uttarakhand. The petitioners expressed that they no longer wish to pursue the relief sought and requested to withdraw the petition. The respondent, the State of U.P. and others, raised no objection to the withdrawal. Accordingly, the court ordered the petition to be dismissed as withdrawn and directed the return of any certified copy of the petition as per rules.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioners without the court's permission

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • procedural law
  • high court

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                WRIT - C No. - 38310 of 2026

                                    Smt Sunny Yadav And Another
                                                                                                           .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                             Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                                        .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)            : Chandra Pal, Rajesh Kumar, Udayveer
                                                                           Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)            : C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 75
                                                     HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

                                    1. याचीगण के विद्वान अधिवक्ता एवं विद्वान मुख्य स्थायी अधिवक्ता उपस्थित हैं।

                                    2. याचीगण के विद्वान अधिवक्ता द्वारा कथन किया गया कि याची सं० 1 उत्तर प्रदेश तथा याची
                                    सं० 2 उत्तराखंड राज्य के निवासी हैं तथा वर्तमान में याचीगण एक-दूसरे के साथ उत्तराखंड में
                                    निवासरत हैं। अतः वह वर्तमान याचिका पर बल नहीं देना चाहते एवं वापस लेना चाहते हैं।

                                    3. विद्वान मुख्य स्थायी अधिवक्ता को कोई आपत्ति नहीं है।

                                    4. तद्नुसार वर्तमान याचिका वापस लिये जाने के आधार पर निरस्त की जाती है।

                                    5. इस याचिका में यदि कोई प्रमाणित प्रति हो, तो उसे नियमानुसार वापस किया जाय।



                                                                                          (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
                                    September 23, 2026
                                    Pawan Kumar




Digitally signed by :-
PAWAN KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.