Allahabad High Court
REENA YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Holding
The petition was dismissed as ineffective because an FIR had already been registered.
Summary
The petitioners Reena Yadav and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The senior permanent advocate informed the court that an FIR under Section 87 of the B.N.S. (case No. MU‑A‑S‑417 of 2026) had already been registered on 15 September 2026 at Bilgram police station, Hardoi district. The petitioners' counsel could not refute this statement. Consequently, the court held that the petition was rendered ineffective due to the existence of the FIR. The petition was therefore dismissed as ineffective.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition is maintainable when an FIR under the relevant provision has already been lodged.
Subjects
- writ petition
- FIR
- dismissal
- maintainability
- criminal procedure
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 38328 of 2026
Reena Yadav And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awanish Kumar Pandey, Rahul Kumar
Tripathi, Shishir Kumar Dwivedi
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 75
HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
1. विद्वान स्थायी अधिवक्ता ने यह सूचित किया कि इस मामले में मु०अ०सं० 417 वर्ष
2026, अंतर्गत धारा 87 बी.एन.एस., थाना बिलग्राम, जनपद हरदोई में दिनांक
15.09.2026 को याची संख्या 2 के विरुद्ध प्रथम सूचना रिपोर्ट दर्ज किया जा चुका है, अतः
यह याचिका निष्प्रभावी हो चुकी है।
2. याचीगण के विद्वान अधिवक्ता, विद्वान स्थायी अधिवक्ता द्वारा दिए गए उपरोक्त कथनों का
खंडन नहीं कर सके।
3. उपरोक्तानुसार यह याचिका निष्प्रभावी होने के कारण निरस्त की जाती है।
(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
September 23, 2026
Pawan Kumar
Digitally signed by :-
PAWAN KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…