Allahabad High Court
SRI NARENDRA LAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- SIDDHARTH NANDAN
Holding
The court allowed the withdrawal application and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Summary
Petitioners filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, they filed a withdrawal application, citing the facts stated therein. The State and other respondents did not object to the withdrawal. The court allowed the withdrawal application, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, and vacated any interim orders that may have been in force.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing and what procedural consequences follow
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- high court procedure
- interim order vacated
- civil writ
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 3849 of 2019
Sri Narendra Lal And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Mani Tripathi, Daya Shanker
Mani Tripahti, Prabhakar Awasthi
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., J.P. Singh
Court No. - 38
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
In Re:-Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No. 4 of 2024:-
1. In view of the facts stated in the withdrawal application, learned counsel
for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the instant petition.
2. Learned Standing Counsel for the State and learned counsel for the
respondent have no objection.
3. Accordingly, the withdrawal application is allowed.
4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Siddharth Nandan,J.)
May 12, 2026
Sushma
Digitally signed by :-
SUSHAMA YADAV
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…