Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

DEEPAK SARASWATversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court held that the writ petition is dismissed as it is not pressed and the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

Summary

Petitioner Deepak Saraswat filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and six other respondents. The petitioner sought dismissal of the petition on the ground that it was not pressed and requested liberty to approach the appropriate forum for relief. The petition was not opposed by the standing counsel for the State or the other respondents. The Court, noting the lack of opposition and the petitioner's request, dismissed the writ petition and granted the liberty sought. No substantive merits of the petition were examined as it was deemed unmaintained.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition that is not pressed and for which the petitioner seeks liberty to approach a competent forum should be dismissed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • competent forum
  • maintainability
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - C No. - 38687 of 2026

                                    Deepak Saraswat
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 6 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)        : Nitesh Kumar Pandey, Vijay Kumar
                                                                       Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)        : C.S.C., Pranjal Mehrotra, Satish
                                                                       Chaturvedi

                                    Court No. - 5
                                                         HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
                                                         HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

                                    1. After some arguments, a prayer has been made by counsel for the
                                    petitioner to dismiss present writ petition as not pressed with liberty to avail
                                    proper remedy before the competent forum/court.

                                    2. The aforesaid prayer has not been opposed by learned Standing Counsel
                                    for the respondent-State, Sri Prem Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel for
                                    the respondent no.4 and Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for the
                                    respondent no.5.

                                    3. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed.


                                                                           (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.)
                                    September 24, 2026
                                    Pramod Tripathi




Digitally signed by :-
PRAMOD TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.