Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAMESH SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The Court ordered that the pending appeal be decided expeditiously and directed similar speedy disposal for any other pending appeals.

Summary

Petitioner Ramesh Shukla filed a writ petition seeking the speedy disposal of his appeal (Appeal No. 111/B) filed under Section 13(1) of the U.P. Essential Commodities (Sale and Distribution Control) Order, 2016 before the Commissioner, Azamgarh Division. The petitioner argued that the appeal had been pending for an undue period and requested the High Court to direct its expeditious hearing. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, observed that the appeal should be decided promptly and directed that any other pending appeals be dealt with in a chronological and swift manner. No substantive discussion on the merits of the appeal was made, as the petition was limited to procedural acceleration. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed with the direction for expeditious disposal of the appeal.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can direct the expeditious disposal of a pending appeal filed under Section 13(1) of the U.P. Essential Commodities (Sale and Distribution Control) Order, 2016.

Legislation cited

  • U.P. Essential Commodities (Sale and Distribution Control) Order, 2016 — s. 13(1)

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • expeditious disposal
  • appeal
  • essential commodities
  • Section 13(1)
  • High Court of Allahabad

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 38694 of 2026

                                    Ramesh Shukla
                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 2 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                  :   Vinod Kumar Sharma
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                  :   C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 36
                                               HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Heard Sri Vinod Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri

                                    Prabhakar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents.


                                    2. Petitioner has approached this Court to expedite his appeal, being
                                    Appeal No. 111/B, Computerized Case No. C202615000001159 (Ramesh

                                    Shukla vs. Sub-Divisional Officer, Bansdeeh, Ballia), filed under Section

                                    13(1) of U.P. Essential Commodities (Sale and Distribution Control)

                                    Order, 2016 before Commissioner, Azamgarh Division, Azamgarh.


                                    3. In aforesaid circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with an

                                    observation that not only the appeal referred but other appeals also, if

                                    pending, be decided expeditiously in accordance with law in a

                                    chronological manner.


                                                                               (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    September 24, 2026
                                    AK




Digitally signed by :-
AWADESH KUMAR
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.