Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SUKHRAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court dismissed the writ petition and granted liberty to file a fresh petition with improved averments.

Summary

The petitioner, Sukhram, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner prayed that the present petition be dismissed, allowing the filing of a fresh writ petition with improved averments and documents. The court considered the request and granted the prayer. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was given liberty to file a new petition. The court also directed that, if a fresh petition is filed, the petitioner’s counsel must serve notice on the respondent’s counsel, Ashish Pratap Singh.

Issues considered

  • Whether the present writ petition should be dismissed and liberty granted to file a fresh petition with better averments?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • fresh petition
  • procedural order

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                             WRIT - C No. - 38713 of 2026

                                    Sukhram
                                                                                                  .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                        Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)              :     Tejas Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)              :     Ashish Pratap Singh, C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 5
                                                         HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
                                                         HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

                                    1. After some arguments, a prayer has been made by counsel for the
                                    petitioner to dismiss present writ petition as not pressed with liberty to file
                                    fresh writ petition with better averments and documents.

                                    2. Prayer made is allowed.

                                    3. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed.

                                    4. This order has been passed in presence of Sri Ashish Pratap Singh,
                                    learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 & 4.

                                    5. It is made clear that if fresh writ petition is filed, counsel for the
                                    petitioner is directed to serve notice upon Sri Ashish Pratap Singh,
                                    Advocate, appearing on behalf of respondent nos.3 & 4 in the present writ
                                    petition,



                                                                           (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.)
                                    September 24, 2026
                                    Pramod Tripathi




Digitally signed by :-
PRAMOD TRIPATHI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.