Allahabad High Court
SMT SANJANA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
- Decided
- Bench
- GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary
The petitioners, Smt Sanjana and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Pradeep Kumar, later informed the court that he did not wish to pursue the petition and sought its dismissal as ‘not pressed’, requesting liberty to file a better petition later. The standing counsel for the State of U.P. and other respondents raised no objection to this request. The Court, after noting the petitioner's intention, dismissed the writ petition as not pressed, granting the liberty sought. The certified copy of the petition, if any, was ordered to be returned to the petitioner's counsel after a photocopy was placed on record.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground that it is not pressed by the petitioner
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- not pressed
- procedural
- Allahabad High Court
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 38729 of 2026
Smt Sanjana And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 75
HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not want to
press this writ petition and it may be dismissed as not pressed, with liberty
to file a better petition.
2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
3. In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed at
this stage, with the liberty as prayed for.
4. Certified copy, if any, annexed with this writ petition, may be returned
to the learned counsel for the petitioners after keeping photocopy of the
same on the record.
(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
September 24, 2026
Mustaqeem.
Digitally signed by :-
MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…