Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. RANI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to file a fresh petition.

Summary

Smt. Rani Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 38761 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court, after considering the request, dismissed the present petition but granted the petitioner permission to file a new petition. The Court also directed that, upon filing the fresh petition, notice will be served on the respondents. No substantive merits of the original petition were examined as the matter was procedural. The order was pronounced by Hon’ble Justices Prakash Padia and Vivek Saran on 24 September 2026.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • fresh petition
  • procedural order
  • court dismissal

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 38761 of 2026

                                    Smt. Rani Devi
                                                                                                    .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 4 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Ashok Kumar Upadhyay, Brajesh
                                                                      Kumar Chaturvedi
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : Ashish Agrawal, C.S.C., Shrey Singh

                                    Court No. - 5
                                                        HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
                                                        HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.

                                    1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for
                                    withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.

                                    2. The writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty.

                                    3. It is made clear that when the fresh petition is filed, he will serve the
                                    notice upon the respondents.

                                    4. This order has been passed in presence of Sri Shrey Singh, learned
                                    counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 4.



                                                                         (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.)
                                    September 24, 2026
                                    gp




Digitally signed by :-
GANESH PRAKASH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.