Allahabad High Court
YOGESH CHANDRA MISHRAversusTHE STATE OF UP AND 11 OTHERS
- Decided
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Yogesh Chandra Mishra, filed writ petition No. 38833 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after a revised call. The Court therefore dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and ordered the petitioner to pay a cost of Rs.500 to the High Court Bar Association. The order also directed that any application for restoration of the petition would be entertained only upon proof of payment of the cost. Consequently, any interim order previously granted was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of counsel?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- cost order
- restoration of petition
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 38833 of 2025
Yogesh Chandra Mishra
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
The State Of Up And 11 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ranjan Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C.
Court No. - 32
HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. None appeared on behalf of petitioner even in revised call.
2. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution with
cost of Rs.500/- to be deposited in the Bank account of High Court Bar
Association, Allahabad.
3. Registry would accept any application for restoration, if filed, only with
proof of payment of cost.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
March 19, 2026
A.N. Mishra
Digitally signed by :-
AMARNATH MISHRA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Checking your session…