Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

NAQSAB ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Naqsab Ali filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, moved the court for withdrawal of the writ petition. The court considered the request and, finding no objection, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The order was recorded in the presence of the respondents' counsel, Utpal Chatterji.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure for withdrawing a writ petition before the High Court?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • writ petition
  • high court procedure
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                           WRIT - C No. - 39031 of 2025

                                    Naqsab Ali
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 6 Others
                                                                                              .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, Vinod
                                                                      Kumar Upadhyay
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : C.S.C., Kaushal Kishore Mani, Utpal
                                                                      Chatterji

                                    Court No. - 36
                                                      HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

                                    1. Sri Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner, prays
                                    for withdrawal of the writ petition.

                                    2. Prayer so made is allowed.

                                    3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

                                    4. This order has been passed in presence of Sri Utpal Chatterji, learned
                                    counsel appearing for the respondents.



                                                                                   (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)
                                    May 14, 2026
                                    Nitika Sri.




Digitally signed by :-
NITIKA SRIVASTAVA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.