Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RUKSHAR KHATOON AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as it is not maintainable due to the existence of a pending case on the same issue.

Summary

The petitioners Rukshar Khatoon and another filed writ petition No. 39534 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The respondents, the State of UP and others, contested the petition. The learned permanent advocate argued that the matter was already registered as Mu. A.0. San 494/2026 under Section 87 of the B.N.S. at Thana Gadhmukte Shwar, Janpad Hapud. The court held that because the issue was pending in another proceeding, the present petition was not maintainable. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as non‑maintainable. The judgment was delivered by Justice Dr. Gautam Chowdhary on 30 September 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the same matter is already pending in another case

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • maintainability
  • res judicata
  • writ petition
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                 WRIT - C No. - 39534 of 2026

                                    Rukshar Khatoon And Another
                                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                               Versus

                                    State Of Up And 4 Others
                                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                              :     Ram Sukh Maurya
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                              :     C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 75
                                                     HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

                                    याचीगण के विद्वान अधिवक्ता व विद्वान स्थायी अधिवक्ता को सुना एवं पत्रावली का परिशीलन
                                    किया।

                                    विद्वान स्थायी अधिवक्ता का कथन है इस प्रश्नगत प्रकरण मु०अ०सं० 494/2026, धारा 87
                                    बी.एन.एस., थाना गढ़मुक्ते श्वर, जनपद हापुड़ में पंजीकृत हो चुकी है। इसलिए, यह याचिका
                                    पोषणीय नहीं है तथा निरस्त किये जाने योग्य है।

                                    तद्नुसार, उपरोक्त तर्कों के परिप्रेक्ष्य में इस याचिका को निरस्त किया जाता है।



                                                                                               (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    CP.sahani




Digitally signed by :-
CHANDRA PRAKASH SAHANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.