Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. VISHESHA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as it is not maintainable due to the existence of a pending case on the same subject.

Summary

The petitioners, Smt. Vishesha Devi and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was opposed by the respondents, who argued that the matter was already pending in another case, Mu. A. S. No. 366/2026, under Section 87 of the B.N.S. at Thana Barkheda, Pilibhit district. The learned permanent advocate for the respondents contended that because the issues were already before another forum, the present petition was not maintainable. The court examined the pleadings and the claim of pendency. Concluding that the earlier case subsumed the present relief sought, the court dismissed the writ petition as non-maintainable.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable when a substantially similar matter is already pending in another case (Mu. A. S. No. 366/2026).

Subjects

  • Writ petition
  • Maintainability
  • Dismissal
  • Pending case
  • Section 87
  • B.N.S.

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                 WRIT - C No. - 39559 of 2026

                                    Smt. Vishesha Devi And Another
                                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                               Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)              : Daraksha Mariyam,                Pavan    Kumar
                                                                             Kushwaha
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)              : C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 75
                                                     HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

                                    याचीगण के विद्वान अधिवक्ता व विद्वान स्थायी अधिवक्ता को सुना एवं पत्रावली का परिशीलन
                                    किया।

                                    विद्वान स्थायी अधिवक्ता का कथन है इस प्रश्नगत प्रकरण मु०अ०सं० 366/2026, धारा 87
                                    बी.एन.एस., थाना बरखेड़ा, जनपद पीलीभीत में पंजीकृत हो चुकी है। इसलिए, यह याचिका
                                    पोषणीय नहीं है तथा निरस्त किये जाने योग्य है।

                                    तद्नुसार, उपरोक्त तर्कों के परिप्रेक्ष्य में इस याचिका को निरस्त किया जाता है।



                                                                                             (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    CP.sahani




Digitally signed by :-
CHANDRA PRAKASH SAHANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.