Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

SMT. SONIYA KUMARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is non‑maintainable and is dismissed.

Summary

Smt. Soniya Kumari and another filed Writ Petition No. 39578 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioners sought relief, but the respondent counsel pointed out that the same dispute had already been registered as case MU‑0‑A‑0‑S 305/2026 under Section 87 of the B.N.S. at Etmadadula police station, Agra district. The Court examined the pleadings and the claim of pendency. Relying on the principle that a matter already pending before a competent authority cannot be re‑invoked through a fresh writ petition, the Court held the petition non‑maintainable. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the same cause of action is already pending under Section 87 of the B.N.S.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • maintainability
  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • Section 87
  • B.N.S.
  • High Court

Judgment

                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                 WRIT - C No. - 39578 of 2026

                                    Smt. Soniya Kumari And Another
                                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                               Versus

                                    State Of Up And 3 Others
                                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                              :     Raj Kishor Mishra
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                              :     C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 75
                                                     HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

                                    याचीगण के विद्वान अधिवक्ता व विद्वान स्थायी अधिवक्ता को सुना एवं पत्रावली का परिशीलन
                                    किया।

                                    विद्वान स्थायी अधिवक्ता का कथन है इस प्रश्नगत प्रकरण मु०अ०सं० 305/2026, धारा 87
                                    बी.एन.एस., थाना एत्माददौला, जनपद आगरा में पंजीकृत हो चुकी है। इसलिए, यह याचिका
                                    पोषणीय नहीं है तथा निरस्त किये जाने योग्य है।

                                    तद्नुसार, उपरोक्त तर्कों के परिप्रेक्ष्य में इस याचिका को निरस्त किया जाता है।



                                                                                               (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
                                    September 30, 2026
                                    CP.sahani




Digitally signed by :-
CHANDRA PRAKASH SAHANI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.