Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

HARI SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed because an alternative remedy was available to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Hari Singh and two others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the petitioners possessed an efficacious alternative remedy in the form of an appeal under the applicable law. The respondent's standing counsel raised no objection to this submission. The Court held that when a competent alternative remedy exists, a writ petition is not maintainable. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition, granting the petitioners liberty to pursue the appeal. No substantive merits of the impugned order were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition is maintainable when an alternative statutory remedy, such as an appeal, is available to the aggrieved party

Subjects

  • writ jurisdiction
  • alternative remedy
  • maintainability
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                           WRIT - C No. - 39802 of 2026

                                    Hari Singh And 2 Others
                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)            :    Nitin Raj Singh, Raj Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)            :    C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 36
                                               HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Heard Sri Raj Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.
                                    Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel.

                                    2. Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions fairly submits that
                                    petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy to challenge the
                                    impugned order by way of filing an appeal in accordance with law and
                                    prayed that the writ petition may be disposed of.

                                    3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid
                                    submission.

                                    4. In the aforesaid circumstances this writ petition is disposed of with
                                    aforesaid liberty.


                                                                              (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    October 1, 2026
                                    SB




Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.