Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RITU DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The court held that the petitioner must first file an application under the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Maintenance of Family Registers) Rules, 1970, and therefore the writ petition is dismissed pending such application.

Summary

The petitioner, Ritu Devi, filed a writ petition seeking the inclusion of her name in the family register maintained under the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj system. The High Court observed that the appropriate remedy is to file an application under the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Maintenance of Family Registers) Rules, 1970. The court directed the petitioner to pursue that administrative procedure to ventilate her grievance. No substantive adjudication on the merits was made. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed, granting the petitioner liberty to file the requisite application, which the respondents must expedite.

Issues considered

  • Is a writ petition maintainable for the inclusion of a name in the family register?
  • Should the petitioner first approach the authority under the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Maintenance of Family Registers) Rules, 1970 before seeking judicial relief?

Legislation cited

  • Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Maintenance of Family Registers) Rules, 1970

Subjects

  • family register
  • Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj
  • maintenance of family registers
  • writ petition
  • administrative remedy
  • inclusion of name

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                            WRIT - C No. - 39898 of 2026

                                    Ritu Devi
                                                                                                .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                       Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 6 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)       : Bhanu Kumar Ratnakar, Mohd. Monis
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)       : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti

                                    Court No. - 36
                                                HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                    2. Petitioner has to file an appropriate application under the provisions of
                                    Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj, (Maintenance of Family Registers) Rules,
                                    1970 to ventilate his grievance for inclusion of his name in the family
                                    register or any other ancillary prayer.

                                    3. In the aforesaid circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with
                                    liberty to petitioner to file a requisite application in a proper format to
                                    ventilate his grievance, which shall be expedited by the concerned
                                    respondent.



                                                                                (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    October 1, 2026
                                    SB




Digitally signed by :-
SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.