Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

JASWANT SINGH (BORROWER)versusUNION BANK OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed as the petitioner has an alternative remedy available before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal.

Summary

Jaswant Singh, a borrower, filed a writ petition challenging an order that was appealable before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal. The High Court examined whether the petition was maintainable given the existence of an alternative remedy. The Court held that the petitioner could pursue the matter before the appropriate tribunal and therefore dismissed the petition. No substantive discussion on the merits of the underlying debt dispute was made. The dismissal was based solely on the principle of alternative remedy.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable when an alternative statutory remedy is available before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal

Subjects

  • Writ petition
  • Alternative remedy
  • Debt recovery
  • Jurisdiction
  • Appealable order

Judgment

                                                  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                           WRIT - C No. - 39922 of 2026

                                    Jaswant Singh (Borrower)
                                                                                               .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                      Versus

                                    Union Bank Of India And 5 Others
                                                                                             .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)      : Daya    Shankar   Mani     Tripathi,
                                                                     Rajeshwari Prasad
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)      : Ashish Agrawal, C.S.C., Krishna
                                                                     Mohan Asthana, Om Prakash Gupta

                                    Court No. - 9
                                                     HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

                                    1. The order impugned is an appealable order before the Debts Recovery
                                    Appellate Tribunal.

                                    2. This petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.

                                    3. Shri Om Prakash Gupta appears for the Union Bank of India.



                                                                                   (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)
                                    October 1, 2026
                                    A. V. Singh




Digitally signed by :-
AJAY VIKRAM SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.