Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

RAM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 57 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The petition is disposed of as the relief sought has been addressed by the commencement of the demarcation procedure.

Summary

Ram Prakash filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and 57 others seeking relief related to a demarcation process. During the pendency of the petition, the respondents, through their standing counsel, informed the court that the demarcation procedure had already been initiated, thereby addressing the relief sought. The court examined the submission and found no substantive ground to keep the petition pending. Consequently, the court ordered the petition to be disposed of. The standing counsel was directed to provide a copy of the instructions to the petitioner's counsel.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground that the relief sought is already being implemented

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • demarcation
  • relief
  • disposal
  • procedural
  • standing counsel

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                          WRIT - C No. - 43198 of 2025

                                    Ram Prakash
                                                                                             .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                    Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 57 Others
                                                                                           .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)                :   Vinay Kumar Singh
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)                :   C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti

                                    Court No. - 32
                                                HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for
                                    respondents.

                                    2. Learned Standing Counsel on instructions submits that during
                                    pendency of this writ petition, procedure for demarcation has been
                                    commenced, therefore, relief sought has been addressed.

                                    3. Taking note of aforesaid submissions, this Court does not find any
                                    ground to keep this petition pending, therefore, it is disposed of.

                                    4. However, learned Standing Counsel will supply a copy of instructions
                                    to learned counsel for petitioner.



                                                                             (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    N. Sinha




Digitally signed by :-
NIRMAL SINHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.