Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

YUSUFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

A writ petition cannot be entertained if the application for impleadment on which it is based has been dismissed.

Summary

Petitioner Yusuf filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court after his application for impleadment was dismissed by the trial court. The petitioner sought to challenge the dismissal and to be impleaded as a party in the underlying proceedings. The respondents contended that the writ petition was not maintainable since the prerequisite application had already been rejected. The court, after hearing counsel, noted the dismissal of the impleadment application and held that the writ petition could not be entertained on that basis. Without addressing the merits, the court disposed of the writ petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be entertained when the underlying application for impleadment has been dismissed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • impleadment
  • procedural dismissal
  • High Court
  • maintainability

Judgment

                                               HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                          WRIT - C No. - 43372 of 2025

                                    Yusuf
                                                                                              .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                     Versus

                                    State Of U.P. And 3 Others
                                                                                            .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)          :      Danish, Rajiv Sisodia
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)          :      Arun Kumar Pandey, C.S.C.

                                    Court No. - 32
                                                HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

                                    1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for
                                    respondents.

                                    2. Learned Standing Counsel, on instructions, has informed that
                                    application filed by petitioner for impleadment has been dismissed,
                                    therefore, present writ petition at the instance of petitioner cannot be
                                    entertained.

                                    3. Taking note of above submissions as well as without entering into
                                    merit of case, this writ petition is disposed of.



                                                                               (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)
                                    March 19, 2026
                                    N. Sinha




Digitally signed by :-
NIRMAL SINHA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.