Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

TAUFIQversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Decided

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 43844 of 2011 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another respondent. The petition remained pending for several years and, on the date of hearing, no representative of the petitioner appeared before the court. The respondent's counsel was present and informed the court that the petitioner appeared disinterested in pursuing the matter. The court observed that the passage of time and the petitioner's lack of interest rendered the petition infructuous. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and discharged any interim orders that may have been in force.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear and appears to have abandoned a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • procedural law
  • abandonment

Judgment

                                                    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

                                                                WRIT - C No. - 43844 of 2011

                                    Taufiq
                                                                                                            .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                                Versus
                                    State of U.P. and Another
                                                                                                          .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :      D.V. Jaiswal, Harsh Vikram
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :      C.S.C., Krishna Mohan Asthana, P.K.Singh

                                    Court No. - 1
                                                       HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
                                                       HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.

                                    List is being revised. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner whereas Sri Ravi
                                    Mishra, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri K.M.Asthana, learned counsel for
                                    respondent is present..

                                    The matter is of the year 2011. It appears that either matter has rendered infructuous
                                    due to efflux of time or the petitioner is no more interesting in pursuing the writ
                                    petition.

                                    However, since petitioner is not present, we are dismissing the present petition for
                                    want of prosecution.

                                    Interim order, if any, stands discharged.

                                    March 18, 2026
                                    Sanjeev
                                                                          (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.)




Digitally signed by :-
SANJEEV RANJAN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.