Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Allahabad High Court

KULDEEP NARAYANversusSTATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. AND 13 OTHERS

Decided

Holding

The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Kuldeep Narayan, filed a writ petition (WRIT-C No. 54797 of 2013) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the petition. Consequently, the Court found that the petition lacked prosecution. The judges dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order that might have been in force. The dismissal was recorded on March 18, 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear or prosecute a writ petition before the High Court?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • procedural law
  • High Court

Judgment

                                             HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
                                                                WRIT - C No. - 54797 of 2013

                                    Kuldeep Narayan
                                                                                                   .....Petitioner(s)
                                                                          Versus

                                    State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 13 Others
                                                                                                 .....Respondent(s)

                                    Counsel for Petitioner(s)             :   Bharat Singh Pal, Neeraj Tripathi
                                    Counsel for Respondent(s)             :   Brijesh Ojha, C.S.C., N.N. Mishra

                                    Court No. - 40
                                                     HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
                                                     HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.

                                    1. List has been revised.

                                    2. No one appears on behalf of petitioner to press this petition.

                                    3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

                                    4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.



                                                                  (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)
                                    March 18, 2026
                                    Gaurav




Digitally signed by :-
GAURAV PATEL
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.